Evaluation of COVID-19 impact on DELAYing diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of lung cancer patients in Italy (COVID-DELAY study): fewer cases and higher stages from a real-world scenario.

INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 has disrupted the global health care system since March 2020. Lung cancer (LC) patients (pts) represent a vulnerable population highly affected by the pandemic. This multicenter Italian study aimed to evaluate whether the COVID-19 outbreak had an impact on access to cancer diagnosis and treatment of LC pts compared with pre-pandemic time. METHODS: Consecutive newly diagnosed LC pts referred to 25 Italian Oncology Departments between March and December 2020 were included. Access rate and temporal intervals between date of symptoms onset and diagnostic and therapeutic services were compared with the same period in 2019. Differences between the 2 years were analyzed using the chi-square test for categorical variables and the Mann-Whitney U test for continuous variables. RESULTS: A slight reduction (-6.9%) in newly diagnosed LC cases was observed in 2020 compared with 2019 (1523 versus 1637, P = 0.09). Newly diagnosed LC pts in 2020 were more likely to be diagnosed with stage IV disease (P < 0.01) and to be current smokers (someone who has smoked more than 100 cigarettes, including hand-rolled cigarettes, cigars, cigarillos, in their lifetime and has smoked in the last 28 days) (P < 0.01). The drop in terms of new diagnoses was greater in the lockdown period (percentage drop -12% versus -3.2%) compared with the other months included. More LC pts were referred to a low/medium volume hospital in 2020 compared with 2019 (P = 0.01). No differences emerged in terms of interval between symptoms onset and radiological diagnosis (P = 0.94), symptoms onset and cytohistological diagnosis (P = 0.92), symptoms onset and treatment start (P = 0.40), and treatment start and first radiological revaluation (P = 0.36). CONCLUSIONS: Our study pointed out a reduction of new diagnoses with a shift towards higher stage at diagnosis for LC pts in 2020. Despite this, the measures adopted by Italian Oncology Departments ensured the maintenance of the diagnostic-therapeutic pathways of LC pts.

Prevalence and impact of COVID-19 sequelae on treatment pathways and survival of cancer patients who recovered from SARS-Cov-2 infection

Background: The long-term impact of COVID-19 in cancer patients (pts) is undefined. Methods: Among 2795 consecutive pts with COVID-19 and cancer registered to OnCovid between 01/2020 and 02/2021, we examined clinical outcomes of pts reassessed post COVID-19 recovery. Results: Among 1557 COVID-19 survivors, 234 (15%) reported sequelae including respiratory symptoms (49.6%), fatigue (41%) and cognitive/psychological dysfunction (4.3%). Persisting COVID-19 sequelae were more likely found in males (p=0.0407) aged ≥65 years (p=0.0489) with ≥2 comorbidities (p=0.0006) and positive smoking history (p=0.0004). Sequelae were associated with history of prior hospitalisation (p<0.0001), complicated disease (p<0.0001) and COVID-19 therapy (p=0.0002). With a median post-COVID-19 follow up of 128 days (95%CI 113-148), multivariable analysis of survival revealed COVID-19 sequelae to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 1.76, 95%CI 1.16-2.66) after adjusting for sex, age, comorbidities, tumour characteristics, anticancer therapy and COVID-19 severity. Out of 473 patients who were on systemic anticancer therapy (SACT) at COVID-19 diagnosis;62 (13.1%) permanently discontinued therapy and 75 (15.8%) received SACT adjustments, respectively. Discontinuations were due to worsening performance status (45.1%), disease progression (16.1%) and residual organ disfunction (6.3%). SACT adjustments were pursued to avoid hospital attendance (40%), prevent immunosuppression (57.3%) or adverse events (20.3%). Multivariable analyses showed permanent discontinuation to be associated with an increased risk of death (HR 4.2, 95%CI: 1.62-10.7), whereas SACT adjustments did not adversely affect survival. Conclusions: Sequelae post-COVID-19 affect up to 15% of patients with cancer and adversely influence survival and oncological outcomes after recovery. SACT adjustments can be safely pursued to preserve oncological outcomes in patients who remain eligible to treatment.

Access to early phase clinical trials during the Covid-19 pandemic

Background: The Covid-19 pandemic has radically changed healthcare organizations. Here, we describe the attitude among Italian physicians toward referring patients to early-phase clinical trials during the pandemic. Methods: We analyzed the responses recorded in the first 72 hours from the beginning of the survey. A 20-question web survey was sent to all the associates of the Italian Association of Medical Oncology. Results: Ninety-five physicians completed the survey;87 (96%) were medical oncologists. Table 1 summarizes participants' characteristics. Overall, 37% of the respondents work in an early clinical trial unit. The vast majority of interviewees (74%) already used to refer patients to early clinical trials in the pre- COVID era. Among these, about 30% sent fewer patients during the pandemic particularly due to logistical issues. Interestingly, 25 (26%) never referred patients because of ineffective networking among institutions. It will take more than 12 months to return to pre-pandemic attitude according to half of the physicians. Most of the respondents affirm that one possible tool to facilitate the recovery is: fostering the clinical research network, favouring alliances between referral and satellite centers, and strengthening telemedicine. More than 70% of participants believe that the COVID-19 pandemic will have an impact on the development of new molecules in the coming years both due to a decrease in the number of open studies and to a diversion of funds towards Covid-19 research. Conclusions: In this analysis, we intended to offer an early snapshot of the Covid -19 effects on early phase trials in Italy. One-third of the participants had to decrease the number of referred patients due to the difficulties of a system exposed to unprecedented stress. Furthermore, the challenges of the last year will have repercussions on drug development in the coming years for the majority of interviewees.

Influenza-like illness and SARS-Cov-2 in the multicenter, prospective, observational INVIDIa-2 study (INfluenza Vaccine Indication During therapy with Immune checkpoint inhibitors: A transversal challenge): A FICOG study

Background: The susceptibility of advanced cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for viral infections has not been investigated. Currently, there are no robust data supporting the efficacy, safety and recommendation for influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving ICI. Methods: The prospective, multicenter, observational INVIDIa-2 study investigated the clinical efficacy of influenza vaccination in advanced cancer patients with solid tumors receiving ICI between October 2019 and January 2020. The incidence of influenza-like illness (ILI, primary endpoint) was observed until April 30, 2020. Secondary endpoints included a non-prespecified analysis for COVID-19. Results: The study enrolled 1279 patients;1188 were evaluable. Of them, 11 patients developed ILI symptoms with confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (incidence of 0.9% and lethality of 72%, irrespective of the flu vaccination). Of the remaining 1177 patients, 574 received flu vaccination (48.8%). The ILI incidence was 7.7% (91 patients of 1177). Patients receiving the flu vaccine were significantly more frequently elderly (p<0.0001), former or active smokers (p<0.0001), affected by lung cancer (p=0.017) and by non-cancer comorbidities (p<0.0001) when compared to unvaccinated patients. The flu vaccine did not prevent ILI in the study population, irrespective of the vaccine type (quadrivalent vs trivalent, adjuvated vs non): the incidence of ILI was 8.2% in vaccinated vs 7.3% in unvaccinated patients (p=0.57). ILI complications were significantly less frequent for patients receiving flu vaccine (12.8% vs 40.9%, p=0.002). Hospital admission due to ILI occurred for 10 patients (11% of ILI cases;7 were unvaccinated). The ILI lethality was 2.2% (2 of 91 patients, both unvaccinated). Among vaccinated patients, those receiving adjuvated vaccines had lower incidence of ILI (4.8% vs 9.9%, p=0.046). Conclusions: Flu vaccination was not effective for ILI prevention, nor for COVID-19. Nevertheless, it reduced ILI complications, with no ILI-related deaths in vaccinated patients. We recommend the vaccine in ICI-treated cancer patients. Clinical trial identification: Eudract number of the trial: 2020-002603-18. Legal entity responsible for the study: FICOG Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups. Funding: FICOG (Federation of Italian Cooperative Oncology Groups, promoter and main sponsor), in turn funded by Seqirus UK and Roche S.p.A. for the present study. Disclosure: M. Bersanelli: Research grant/Funding (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), for the present study: Seqirus and Roche;Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses, for other activities outside the present study: Pfizer, BMS, Novartis. S. Buti: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb (BMS), Pfizer;MSD, Ipsen, Roche, Eli-Lilly, AstraZeneca and Novartis. U. De Giorgi: Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca, Roche, Sanofi;Honoraria (self): Astellas, Bayer, BMS, Ipsen, Janssen, Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi. P. Bonomo: Honoraria (self): Merck Serono, Angelini Pharma,. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.